Depth of Field vs. Selective Focus
Sunday, February 11th, 2007This is something that has come to my attention while surfing flickr. More than once, I’ve seen people refer to as depth of field what I had learned to be known as selective focus.
The difference is, an image displaying a shallow depth of field is said to have selective focus. The background isn’t in focus, or blurry, which draws more attention to the subject, which is in focus. It’s usually shot wide open, an f-stop of 1.8-5.6. In actuality, an image with good selective focus is showing a shallow depth of field.
On the other hand, an image with great depth of field is shot at an smaller aperture, such as f11 and higher, which results in the subject and background being in focus. This is good for shooting landscapes or if you want to emphasize perspective.

selective focus: the background is blurry

depth of field: the pillars in distance are still sharp
I don’t thing I’m being elitist or anything, I just have a peeve with people using the right terminology for things, or rather, more specific. Otherwise, it can get rather confusing. Or maybe it’s just me.
Posted in photography | 2 Comments »



